One size doesn’t fit all

by Diane - April 19th, 2010.
Filed under: Education & Teaching, Play & Toys, Pretend & Real Violence, Take Action!. Tagged as: , .

Reprint of Boston Globe Op-Ed by Nancy Carlsson-Paige and Diane E. Levin

THE PROPOSED common core national education standards for K-12 — which will impose higher academic standards on younger children — contradict decades of early education theory and research about how young children learn best and how to close the achievement gap.

The imposition of one-size-fits-all standards on young children can’t solve the problems of an education system that is fundamentally unequal. Children in wealthy school districts receive many times the resources that children in poor communities do. The United States stands out in sharp contrast to the many countries that take a central and equal approach to school funding. Our unequal funding only adds to the disadvantages, such as hunger and lack of health care, that so many children bring to school resulting from the widening income disparities in our nation.

The proposed standards focus exclusively on teaching isolated reading and math skills starting in kindergarten. Academic learning is separated from social, emotional, and physical growth. But theory, research, and experience tell us that meaningful learning in young children does not come from rote skills. Children build knowledge through hands-on experience with materials, peers, and teachers in meaningful ways that relate to what they already know, to their developmental levels, and their interests.

If adopted, the national standards will lead to more rote learning by all young children, but especially our poorest young learners who are in overcrowded classrooms with less qualified teachers who will have to resort to more direct instruction rather than hands-on, experiential learning. Even if we did see better test scores after an implementation of national standards, it’s unlikely that children would be able to apply the skills learned by rote to real-life situations, use them to solve new problems, or discover the satisfactions inherent when learning is meaningful. This will set young children up for school failure later on when transfer of knowledge and self-motivation become crucial to school success.

The increase in teacher-directed instruction that has resulted from No Child Left Behind has already pushed play out of the curriculum in kindergartens countrywide. This is a far greater problem than many realize. Play is the cornerstone of social, emotional, and cognitive learning and healthy development. It is through play that children develop the foundation for cognitive concepts, problem solving skills, and critical thinking which is essential for later academic learning. Play generates imagination and creativity, planning and self-regulation. It helps children develop a love for learning.

The No Child Left Behind Act, with its high-stakes testing beginning in 3rd grade, has led many schools, especially in poor communities, to start the drill and testing regime in kindergarten. This shift, even before the release of the new standards, has eroded the foundation young children need for school success.

We won’t make genuine progress in closing the achievement gap in our nation’s schools until we address the underlying inequities that are its root cause. Imposing more standards and tests is a misplaced, misleading, even harmful approach. If these standards are imposed, we will see a continuing achievement gap and new levels of stress and failure among young children. Worst of all, we will have missed an opportunity to give our nation’s children the best possible education, the one they deserve and the one our future depends on.

Nancy Carlsson-Paige, a professor of education at Lesley University, is author of “Taking Back Childhood.’’ Diane E. Levin, a professor of education at Wheelock College, is author of “ So Sexy So Soon.’’

Discuss
COMMENTS
© Copyright 2010 Globe Newspaper Company.

5 Responses to One size doesn’t fit all

  1. Thank you so much for writing this column. I hope that with your persuasive voice (and Dr. Carlsson-Paige’s as well), people will realize the damage we do to young children by adopting these narrow, objectionable standards.
    As I wrote today at my blog, you two are my heroes!

  2. Amen! I’m not in the classroom right now, as I’m doing a stint as a stay-at-home-mom, but I know that the university’s lab school where I worked provides an amazing preschool and kindergarten environment that allows for exploration, free play, group activities, and individual choice. When I compare my son’s three years’ experience in that setting (including kindergarten) with his public school years in 1st through 4th grade now, the differences are incredibly huge.

    Thank you for yet another meaningful and much-needed piece from both of you!

  3. Karen, Thank you so much for your appreciative comments. And thank you sooooooo much for helping to get the word out about Nancy and my op ed on the very distressing, newly proposed, soon to be adopted core standards. It is an uphill struggle. Everyone who cares about the issue and the well-being of young children needs to get involved. There is not a lot of discussion in the media about the problems with the core standards, or the fact that only one early childhood educator was involved in helping to frame the standards for young children. So many of the supporters of these standards, think they are promoting the well being of children because they don’t understand young children and how they learn So I say again, thank you for doing your part to help generate activism. Next we need to deal with all the ways teachers are increasingly getting blamed for the problems in schools!

  4. Dear Morning Mama, Your description of your son’s 2 school experiences make me very sad–for him and for all the other children who are in classrooms like your son’s elementary school.

    As a child with a stay-at home mom, your son will get experiences out of school that will help compensate for the experiences he isn’t getting at school. Many children in situations like his, will not get that compensation at home–and they will be the ones who most need those kinds of active, engaging, hands on experience you can provide. Makes me very worried, too, not just sad.

    And you son’s elementary teachers may also feel sad. I know so many good teachers who feel verrrrrry stressed out about the loss of control they have over their teaching and over doing what they know is best for children.

    Not an easy time to be a teacher or a child in so many of our No Child Left Behind schools! And it’s not likely to get better with the new Common Core standards Nancy and I wrote about.

  5. Diane, you hit the nail on the head exactly! My son’s teacher this year is really fantastic, but she’s definitely hindered by NCLB (and a very rigid principal). Here’s hoping some changes can be made to our public education system before my younger children go to school!

Leave a Reply